Although the
second and the third conditionals in English are both used to talk about things
that we think are unreal, they deal with two very different scenarios. The
former appears in situations where we think the condition (which is expressed
by the part of the sentence containing the conjunction 'if' or 'Unless')
is counterfactual or rather unlikely to happen. The latter, on its part, is about the past and it
denotes a condition that we think had the possibility of happening sometime in
the past though it didn't really happen.
If he worked hard, he would pass the exam. (Though we admit that he has the chance to pass the exam with hard work, we don't really think he'll work hard.)
If he had worked hard, he would have passed the exam. (Though we admit that it he had the chance to pass the exam with hard work, he didn't work hard and therefore didn't pass the exam.)
However, when the condition is a thing of the past but the result concerns the present or the future, the statement may take a mixed form:
If he had worked hard, he would be rich today. (Though we're talking about hard work that wasn't done in the past, the possible result of it - i.e. his chance of being rich by now - concerns the present.)
They would come to the party tomorrow if we had invited them at the office yesterday. (Though the result - their attending the party - is about the future, i.e. tomorrow, the time to invite them is already past, i.e. at the office yesterday, and therefore it's no longer possible to invite them.)
If I had studied harder, I wouldn't have to repeat the exam next year. (I didn't study hard enough in the past, so I'll have to repeat the exam in the future.)
Sometimes it could be the other way round too: the condition may be something that’s valid even at present though the result occurred in the past.
If he worked hard, he would pass the exam. (Though we admit that he has the chance to pass the exam with hard work, we don't really think he'll work hard.)
If he had worked hard, he would have passed the exam. (Though we admit that it he had the chance to pass the exam with hard work, he didn't work hard and therefore didn't pass the exam.)
However, when the condition is a thing of the past but the result concerns the present or the future, the statement may take a mixed form:
If he had worked hard, he would be rich today. (Though we're talking about hard work that wasn't done in the past, the possible result of it - i.e. his chance of being rich by now - concerns the present.)
They would come to the party tomorrow if we had invited them at the office yesterday. (Though the result - their attending the party - is about the future, i.e. tomorrow, the time to invite them is already past, i.e. at the office yesterday, and therefore it's no longer possible to invite them.)
If I had studied harder, I wouldn't have to repeat the exam next year. (I didn't study hard enough in the past, so I'll have to repeat the exam in the future.)
Sometimes it could be the other way round too: the condition may be something that’s valid even at present though the result occurred in the past.
I wouldn't have
done it if I were you.
(The condition 'if were you' is used in the form of the second conditional
because of its timeless quality though the part 'I wouldn't have done it' is
about the past.)
You would have
understood it if you knew German. (You didn't understand it because you don't know
German. The fact that you didn't understand belongs to the past, but even now
you don’t know German – i.e. assuming you haven’t learnt the language in the
meantime.)
(Image credit: whatmegsaid)
"They would come to the party tonight if we had invited them. (Though the result - i.e. their attending the party - is about the future, the time to invite them is already past and therefore it's no longer possible to invite them, according to this sentence.) "
ReplyDeletei feel this sentence is incorrect. correct would be: they would have come to the party, if we had invited them. (but now it's too late)
or
they would come to the party, if we invited them. (but we're not inviting them)
or
they will come to the party, if we invite them (we can or not invite them, that's up to us)
regards
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteI was referring to a situation where the speaker is talking during the daytime about a party to be held later in the day (tonight), but the time for inviting is already over. Anyway, I'll change it to a form that is less confusing.
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteFor more examples of this type of mixed conditionals, see the first two sections of the following web page:
'http://www.englishpage.com/conditional/mixedconditional.html'
If you need even more evidence, refer to the following as well:
'http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/en/grammar/mixed_conditionals.htm'
'http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/IF8.cfm'
'http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv344.shtml'
Nice and very useful. Thanks
ReplyDelete@Siribiris
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome.
මේ ඉංග්රීසි වල නැවතීම් තිත නැතිව දිගටම වාක්ය සම්බන්ධ කරන විදිය තමයි තේරුම් ගන්න අමාරු. කියවද්දි යන්තම් අදහස තේරුම් ගන්න පුඵවන්. ඒත් ලියන්න ගියොත් හිතාගන්න අමාරුයි.
ReplyDeleteදුප්පත් කඩ්ඩන්ට මේ සම්බන්ධ කිරීම් ගැන ලිපි කිහිපයකින් විස්තර කරනවනම් ඉතාම වටිනව.
@Anonymous
ReplyDeleteමම හිතන්නේ 'ඉංගිරිසි' බ්ලොග් අඩවියේ 'Put a Comma Here, Period! කොමාවට තිත තියමුද?'(http://ingirisi.blogspot.com/2010/08/put-comma-here-period.html) ලිපිය බැලුවොත් ඔය ප්රශ්න සෑහෙන දුරට විසඳෙයි.